http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_logo.jpg

Customs News Bulletin

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img01.jpg

 

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img02.jpg

 

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img03.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img04.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img05.jpg

 

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img06.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img07.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img08.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img09.jpg

 

15 November 2016

 

 

Latest News

DONALD TRUMP’S ECONOMIC POLICY OF PROTECTIONISM: HOW FAR CAN HE GO?

Resulting from Mr Donald Trump's promises during his election campaign, there are now many concerns that his anti-globalisation mantra will spread protectionism around the globe, put up unnecessary tariff and non-tariff barriers and curb global economic growth.  It is however unlikely that these promises will ever materialise.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) fights protectionism in a number of ways and WTO Members may not follow policies of protectionism. WTO Member states agree to abide by WTO trade rules aimed against protectionism. In the event of the suspicion of unfair trade practices by a member, other members may use the WTO dispute settlement system in enforcing those agreements and rules. The WTO also monitors the trade policies of members through various mechanisms to make sure that WTO rules are not violated or circumvented.

In January 2016, the New York Times reported that Mr. Trump said he would favor a 45 percent tariff on Chinese exports to the United States.

If anyone in South Africa wants to impose such high rates of duty an application should be submitted to the International Trade Commission of South Africa (ITAC), and it should be investigated by ITAC. The applications should be made for individual products as South Africa, as a WTO Member has made offers to the WTO on each tariff line.  These bindings were “offered” to the WTO during the WTO Uruguay Round of the WTO which led to WTO 1994 (The Marrakech Agreement).

The following is an indication about procedures that must be followed if a Government wants to take remedial action against increased imports from a country or region:

The International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) initiated an investigation for remedial action in the form of a safeguard against the increased imports of flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, or other alloy steel but excluding stainless steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated and not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), through Notice No. 469 of 2016 of Government Gazette No. 40171 dated 29 July 2016.  It was not just decided to impose high tariffs (customs duties) on the commodities in question, or to any product imported from China.

Upon initiation of the investigation, interested parties were invited to submit comments on the initiation of the investigation.

On the basis of the information at ITAC’s disposal, it made a preliminary determination that there were unforeseen developments which led to the surge of imports; the SACU industry is suffering serious injury; and there is a causal link between the serious injury suffered by the SACU industry and the surge of imports. ITAC considered whether there were critical circumstances where a delay in imposition of provisional measures, would cause damage that would be difficult to repair threatening injury.

ITAC made a preliminary determination not to request the Commissioner for South African Revenue Service (SARS) (Customs) to impose a provisional payment on the commodities in question.

Investigations of this nature are conducted in accordance with the International Trade Administration Act, 2002 (ITA Act) and the International Trade Administration Commission Safeguard Regulations (SGR), read with the World Trade Organization Agreement on Safeguards (the Safeguard Agreement).

Interested parties are normally invited to comment in writing to ITAC’s preliminary determination within a specific period, in this instance 14 days from the date the preliminary report is made available.

Interested parties are also invited to submit comments on whether it will be in the public interest to impose definitive safeguard measures on the subject product, in accordance with Section 20.2 of the SGR. These should be submitted separately from the comments on ITAC’s preliminary determination.

Interested parties may or may not wish to attend public hearings to make the process fair and transparent, and to comply with national and international legislation. The dates of the public hearings will differ, depending on the dates of the investigations. The dates are published in the Notice relating to the investigation.

On 4 November 2016 ITAC published a notice of the preliminary determination in the investigation for remedial action in the form of a safeguard against the increased imports of flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, or other alloy steel but excluding stainless steel, of all widths, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated and not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced). (See Notice 1385 which was published in Government Gazette 40404 of 4 November 2016.

In this case ITAC said the following about the public hearings and the dates therefore:

“Interested parties that do not wish to attend public interest hearings but want to make submissions on public interest, should indicate such on or before 18 November 2016 at 15h00, and may make their submissions in writing including a non-confidential version to the Senior Manager: Trade Remedies I on or before 25 November 2016 at 15h00.

All interested parties wishing to attend the public hearing on public interest and wish to make oral representations to the Commission (ITAC) on public interest, should indicate their intention to attend on or before 18 November 2016 at 15h00 to the Senior Manager: Trade Remedies I.

All interested parties wishing to address the Commission on public interest should submit a detailed version, including a non-confidential version, of the information to be discussed at the public hearing, in writing to the Senior Manager: Trade Remedies I on or before 25 November 2016 at 15h00. A party that did not timeously submit a non-confidential version of the information to be discussed at the public hearing will not be allowed to take part in the public hearing.

A public hearing is scheduled for 29 November 2016 at 10h00 at the address as indicated below. Parties requesting to attend the public hearing should note that this will be an open hearing with all parties present and only non-confidential information should be presented during the public hearing.”

Should you have any queries regarding this case, contact the investigating officers, Mr Zuko Ntsangani at telephone number +27 12 394 3662, Mr Busman Makakola at telephone number +27 12 394 3380 or Ms Mosa Sebe at telephone number + 27 394 1850 or at fax +27 12 394 0516.

From the above you can clearly see, that, it is not possible for anyone, even the leader of a country, to take any action they want against “cheap imports”.

WCO HS 2017 COMPLIMENTARY PUBLICATIONS

In addition to the entry into force of the Southern African Development Community (SADC)/European Union (EU) Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU)/Mercosur Free Trade Agreement which necessitated the replacement of Schedule No. 1 Part 1 of the South African Customs and Excise Act, which is also the HS-based Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Common External Tariff (CET), the Harmonized System will also be replaced by a new version, HS 2017, with effect from 1 January 2017.

This will be the sixth version of the HS since its introduction with effect from 1 January 1988.  In terms of SACU’s commitments under the HS Agreement, large parts of Schedule No. 1 Part 1 will once again be amended with effect from 1 January 2017. All complimentary World Customs Organization (WCO) HS publications will be replaced by new publications and products.

LexisNexis acts as an agent for the WCO. We import their publications from Belgium for our local customers. Please see below the latest WCO update with regards to delivery of the 2017 editions.

Due to legal requirements the 2012 edition of the Online HS Database is applicable until 31 December 2016. If you are subscribed to the online database, your database will automatically be updated with the 2017 online edition on 1 January 2017.

Some of LexisNexis’ clients have already ordered their HS 2017 publication.

LexisNexis received correspondence from the WCO stating that there has been a delay with the delivery of the 2017 printed publications.  The following new dates have been supplied by the WCO:

HS 2017 Explanatory Notes and Nomenclature:

Subscribers can expect delivery in early December 2016. 

HS 2017 Alphabetical Index:

Subscribers can expect delivery at the end of January 2017.

The updated Compendium of Classification Opinions will be dispatched with either the Explanatory Notes or the Alphabetical Index.

See https://www.lexisnexis.co.za/Promotions/LexisNexis_WCO_2017/WCO_6th_Ed_Flyer.pdf for more information about the HS 2017 publications and products.

 

Customs Tariff Applications and Outstanding Tariff Amendments

The International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) is responsible for tariff investigations, amendments, and trade remedies in South Africa and on behalf of SACU.

Tariff investigations include: Increases in the customs duty rates in Schedule No. 1 Part 1 of Jacobsens. These applications apply to all the SACU Countries, and, if amended, thus have the potential to affect the import duty rates in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland and South Africa.

Reductions in the customs duty rates in Schedule No. 1 Part 1. These applications apply to all the SACU Countries, and, if amended, thus have the potential to affect the import duty rates in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland and South Africa.

Rebates of duty on products, available in the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), for use in the manufacture of goods, as published in Schedule No. 3 Part 1, and in Schedule No. 4 of Jacobsens. Schedule No. 3 Part 1 and Schedule No. 4, are identical in all the SACU Countries.

Rebates of duty on inputs used in the manufacture of goods for export, as published in Schedule No. 3 Part 2 and in item 470.00. These provisions apply to all the SACU Countries.

Refunds of duties and drawbacks of duties as provided for in Schedule No. 5. These provisions are identical in all the SACU Countries.

Trade remedies include: Anti-dumping duties (in Schedule No. 2 Part 1 of Jacobsens), countervailing duties to counteract subsidisation in foreign countries (in Schedule No. 2 Part 2), and safeguard duties (Schedule No. 2 Part 3), which are imposed as measures when a surge of imports is threatening to overwhelm a domestic producer, in accordance with domestic law and regulations and consistent with WTO rules.

To remedy such unfair pricing, ITAC may, at times, recommend the imposition of substantial duties on imports or duties that are equivalent to the dumping margin (or to the margin of injury, if this margin is lower)

Countervailing investigations are conducted to determine whether to impose countervailing duties to protect a domestic industry against the unfair trade practice of proven subsidised imports from foreign competitors that cause material injury to a domestic producer.

Safeguard measures, can be introduced to protect a domestic industry against unforeseen and overwhelming foreign competition and not necessarily against unfair trade, like the previous two instruments.

Dumping is defined as a situation where imported goods are being sold at prices lower than in the country of origin, and also causing financial injury to domestic producers of such goods. In other words, there should be a demonstrated causal link between the dumping and the injury experienced.

The International Trade Commission of South Africa (ITAC) also publishes Sunset Review Applications in relation to anti-dumping duty in terms of which any definitive anti-dumping duty will be terminated on a date not later than five years from the date of imposition, unless the International Trade Administration Commission determines, in a review initiated before that date on its own initiative or upon a duly substantiated request made by or on behalf of the domestic industry, that the expiry of the duty would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury.

ITAC published the latest applications to amend the Common External Tariff (CET) of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) under cover of Notice No. 730 in Government Gazette No. 40402 of 4 November 2016. The ITAC List No. is 09/2016.

The application deals with an errantum to amend the wording for tariff sub-heading 8704.21.75 as per publication Notice No. 1007 of 2015, Government Gazette No. 39324; for a reduction in the general rate of Customs duty on diesel goods vehicles of a mass not exceeding 1 100kg and petrol and electric goods vehicles with a capacity of a mass not exceeding 800kg and relates to an application of Smith Mining Equipment (Pty) (Ltd) t/a: Smith Power Equipment.

For more information contact:

Tshepiso Sejamoholo, Nonhlanhla Khumalo, Lufuno Maliaga at Tel: 012 394 41605/3693/3835 or e-mail: tsejamoholo@itac.org.za, nkhumalo@itac.org.za,

lmaliaga@itac.org.za. (ITAC Ref. 01/2015)

Comments are due on 18 November 2016.

 

 

 

Customs Tariff Amendments

With the exception of certain parts of Schedule No. 1, such as Schedule No. 1 Part 2 (excise duties), Schedule No. 1 Part 3 (environmental levies), Schedule No. 1 Part 5 (fuel and road accident fund levies), the other parts of the tariff is amended by SARS based on recommendations made by ITAC resulting from the investigations relating to Customs Tariff Applications received by them. The ITAC then investigates and makes recommendations to the Minister of Trade and Industry, who requests the Minister of Finance to amend the Tariff in line with the ITAC's recommendations. SARS is responsible for drafting the notices to amend the tariff, as well as for arranging for the publication of the notices in Government Gazettes.

During the annual budget speech by the Minister of Finance in February, it was determined that parts of the tariff that are not amended resulting from ITAC recommendations, must be amended through proposals that are tabled by the Minister of Finance.

Once a year, big tariff amendments are published by SARS, which is in line with the commitments of South Africa and SACU under international trade agreements.

Under these amendments, which are either published in November or early in December, the import duties on goods are reduced under South Africa's international trade commitments under existing trade agreements.

On 21 October 2016, SARS published two amendments to the Southern African Customs Union Tariff to implement the entry into force of free trade agreements to which South Africa are signatory to: The SACU Mercosur Agreement and the SADC EPA with the European Union.  The effective dates of these agreements were 1 April 2016 and 10 October 2016.

Two notices were published to give effect to the implementation of SACU’s offer to the EU on fish products of Chapters 3 and 16 of the HS (Notice R. 1283) and on industrial products (Notice R. 1284).  The effective dates of these two notices were 10 October 2016.

When these notices were published the MERCOSUR rates of duty on these products were amended unintentionally.

Two correction notices have been published to re-instate the MERCOSUR rates of duty on these commodities, with effect to 10 October 2016.  The correction notices were published in Government Gazette No. 40401 on 4 November 2016.   The Notice numbers were R. 1369 and R. 1370.  The Jacobsens reference numbers for these notices are A1/1/1555 and A1/1/1554.

 

Customs Rule Amendments

The Customs and Excise Act is amended by the Minister of Finance. Certain provisions of the Act are supported by Customs and Excise Rules, which are prescribed by the Commission of SARS. These provisions are numbered in accordance with the sections of the Act. The rules are more user-friendly than the Act, and help to define provisions which would otherwise be unclear and difficult to interpret.

Forms are also prescribed by rule, and are published in the Schedule to the Rules.

There were no amendments to the Rules to the Customs and Excise Act, 1964 at the time of publication.

For more information about the latest Rule amendments view the latest Customs Watch on the Jacobsens website and the Jacobsens Customs News Bulletin of 28 October 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information:

 

Contact the Author:

Havandren Nadasan
Jacobsens Editor

Tel: 031-268 3510
e-mail to:
jacobsens@lexisnexis.co.za

 

Leon Marais
Independent Customs Consultant
Tel: 053-203 0727
e-mail to:
leon@itacs.co.za

 

LexisNexis

 

© Customs News Bulletin is prepared for distribution by LexisNexis. It is for information only, and does not constitute the provision of professional advice of any kind. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication can be accepted by the author, copyright owner or publisher.

Copyright: LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd retains the copyright of this email. No part of this email may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the publisher's written permission. Any unauthorised reproduction of this work will constitute a copyright infringement and render the doer liable under both civil and criminal law.

To unsubscribe e-mail jacobsens@lexisnexis.co.za.